For each statement, circle C = Correlation or CA = Causation, then briefly explain your reasoning.
| Statement | Circle one | Your reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Students who eat breakfast tend to get higher test scores. | C CA | |
| Smoking causes lung cancer (supported by many controlled studies). | C CA | |
| Countries with more TVs per person have higher life expectancy. | C CA | |
| Watering a plant makes it grow taller (in a controlled experiment). | C CA | |
| Nicolas Cage movie releases correlate with pool drownings. | C CA | |
| Children with bigger shoe sizes read better. | C CA |
For each spurious correlation below, fill in all three boxes.
The correlation:
The hidden confound:
Honest headline:
The correlation:
The hidden confound:
Honest headline:
Why this looks suspicious:
The real explanation:
Should we close hospitals? Why/why not?
Scenario: A researcher finds that cities with more coffee shops have lower rates of heart disease. A newspaper headline reads: "Coffee Shops Prevent Heart Disease, New Study Finds!"
Write a C-E-R argument explaining whether the headline is justified.
1. A study finds that students who attend tutoring programs score higher on math tests. A school decides to make tutoring mandatory for all struggling students. What questions should you ask before concluding tutoring causes better scores?
2. Why is it dangerous to make policies based on spurious correlations? Give one real example of harm that could result.
3. What is one question you can always ask to test whether a correlation might actually be causation?
Find one example of a correlation claim in real life (news, social media, a teacher/parent statement, advertisement, etc.).
My analysis: